• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    “The Trails Act: Railroading Property Owners and Taxpayers for More than a Quarter Century”

    July 27, 2010

    Arent Fox partner Thor Hearne and associates Lindsay Brinton and Meghan Largent have been published in the latest edition of the Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal, a law review published four times annually by the American Bar Association's Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Section.

    The article "presents a practitioner's view of the conflict between the worthy objective the Trails Act was intended to achieve and the realities of how the Act serves to take property from landowners without providing the just compensation the Fifth Amendment requires."

    Thor and his co-authors make several recommendations on how to change the Trails Act to reduce the inequities that result from its implementation.

    The National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983 were adopted for the purpose of converting abandoned rail lines into public recreational trails and preserving the otherwise abandoned easements by allowing the federal Surface Transportation Board (STB) to grant any railroad the ability to build a new rail line across this land at some indefinite date in the future. The Trails Act is legislation with a worthy objective, but the Trails Act is seriously flawed in the means by which it seeks to accomplish this objective. The flaws in the Trails Act, combined with the STB's implementation of the Act and the Department of Justice's (DOJ) legal strategy defending against claims arising under the Trails Act, have made the Trails Act massively and needlessly more costly for taxpayers. ...

    Fortunately, the legitimate objectives of the Trails Act -- establishing public recreational trails and preserving railroad corridors -- may be achieved fairly and cost-effectively. But this can only be accomplished if Congress, the STB and the DOJ change how the Trails Act is written, administered, and defended. If these changes are made, it will result in an act that treats landowners fairly, establishes more and better trails, and spends less of the taxpayers' money.

    To full read the full article in the Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal, please click here.

    Related People

    • Lindsay Brinton
    • Mark F. (Thor) Hearne, II*
    • Meghan S. Largent

    Related Practices

    Commercial Litigation
    Real Estate
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.