• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    $78 Million Reasons Not to Copy North Face and Polo

    September 20, 2010

    The North Face Apparel Co. and PRL USA Holdings Inc. recently were awarded a $78 million default judgment over a huge Chinese counterfeit ring that was selling counterfeit versions of their trademark goods via the Internet. The case, filed in the Southern District of New York, marks a huge victory against online counterfeiters and shows that the courts and plaintiffs are becoming savvier when combating online infringement.

    The two companies joined forces after determining that 6,500 domain names were marketing or distributing knock-off versions of their popular brands. This meant that the case involved in more than 130 websites that were either advertising the brands via potentially “lifted” images or otherwise selling the counterfeit products.

    North Face and Polo alleged that the sites and domain names were actually a network that was mainly traced back to one website, B2BSharing.com. B2BSharing.com is a sophisticated operation that appears to be located in Hong Kong. The sites at issue also sold merchandise bearing other trademarks, including Balenciaga, Louis Vuitton, Gucci, Coach, Ugg, Timberland, Nike and Ed Hardy. The plaintiffs learned that B2BSharing.com is operated by Fujian Sharing Import & Export Ltd., which has an unknown address in China.

    As a result of the court’s ruling, any domain name used by the defendants for the sale of counterfeit products will be disabled and transferred to the ownership and control of the plaintiffs. Further, more than 100 payment accounts used by the counterfeit ring were captured and the judge requested that a dollar amount high in the six figures be transferred from the defendants PayPal account to the companies for partial payment. Thus, even though the plaintiffs are not likely to recover even close to the $78 million payout, they will likely receive enough to cover the cost for the plaintiffs to bring the action and will also serve to deter future counterfeiters.

    Arent Fox is monitoring this issue. For more details, please contact Anthony V. Lupo or Sarah Bruno.

    Anthony V. Lupo
    lupo.anthony@arentfox.com
    202.857.6353

    Sarah L. Bruno
    bruno.sarah@arentfox.com
    202.775.5760

    Related People

    • Sarah L. Bruno
    • Anthony V. Lupo

    Related Practices

    Advertising, Promotions & Data Security

    Related Industries

    Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.