• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Arent Fox's Michael Cryan Discusses Potential US Supreme Court Action in Major Employment Law Case

    February 12, 2008

    The US Supreme Court will soon decide whether to take up an employment law case being litigated by Arent Fox partner Michael Cryan "that could clarify the roles of arbitrators and the National Labor Relations Board regarding final wage offers imposed by employers when reopened negotiations reach an impasse."

    Employment Law 360 reports the high court is expected to decide this week on whether to take the case, titled Five Star Parking v. Union Local 723 (Case No. 07-699).

    The case involves an parking garage company that reduced its employees wages by 12.5% after declaring an impasse had been reached during "reopener" negotiations.

    According to Employment Law 360, some labor experts believe that a denial of writ by the Supreme Court could lead to few reopener clauses in future labor contracts, while others argue the justices should deny the petition because arbitrator awards are usually "impregnable to changes by the courts."

    Arent Fox, which represents the employer, is challenging a decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which held that the arbitrator in the parking garage labor dispute had the authority to (i) find the parking garage had violated the collective bargaining agreement and (ii) order the employer to pay back wages.

    The US District Court for the District of New Jersey had initially found that arbitrator had exceeded his authority, accepting Arent Fox's argument on behalf of the employer that only the NLRB could determine whether an impasse had been reached.

    In the writ of certiorari filed with the Supreme Court, Cryan wrote, "This issue presents a question of overriding importance because it affects reopener bargaining nationwide. Indeed, absent resolution by this court, reopener bargaining may become a 'charade' rather than an important part of the collective bargaining process."

    Interviewed by Employment Law 360, Cryan elaborated: "The collective bargaining agreement did not give the employer the right to implement its last offer upon an impasse, the National Labor Relations Act gave the employer that right, which is why this is not an issue that should be subject to arbitration."

    To read the full Employment Law 360 article, please click here.

    Related People

    • Michael S. Cryan

    Related Practices

    Commercial Litigation
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.