• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Clothing, Footwear, and Fragrance Manufacturers Hit Competitors with Trademark Infringement Suits

    September 21, 2010

    American companies that make apparel, footwear, and/or fragrances are using trademark infringement litigation to fight back against perceived copying of clothing designs, shoe designs, and other trademarks.

    On August 3, 2010, the maker of Keds shoes filed a trademark infringement suit against Puma North America, Inc, alleging that Puma’s Alexander McQueen Scarred Street sneakers infringe a trademarked two-stripe design that appears on Keds sneakers. In a complaint filed in federal court in Massachusetts, SR Holdings, LLC claims that Puma’s Scarred Street sneakers incorporate a confusingly similar design that is likely to mislead consumers as to the source of the shoes. See SR Holdings, LLC v. Puma North America, Inc., Docket No. 10-cv-11301 (D. Mass. Aug. 3, 2010). Please see below for images of the Keds design, called the Pro-Keds Power Stripe, and the Puma Scarred Street design.

    Pro-Keds Power Stripe Shoe Puma Alexander McQueen Scarred Street shoes

    On August 4, denim maker Levi Straus & Co. filed a similar action in California federal court, alleging that competitor Revise Clothing, Inc.’s Vanilla Star jeans infringe Levi’s trademarked Arcuate pocket stitching design. See Levi Strauss & Co. v. Revise Clothing, Inc., Docket No. 10-cv-3427 (ND Cal. Aug. 4, 2010). Please see below for images of the Levi Strauss Arcuate pocket stitching design and the Revise Vanilla Star design.

    Levi Strauss Arcuate pocket
    design
    Revise Vanilla Star pocket design

    Both Levi Strauss and SR Holdings allege violations of federal trademark and unfair competition law. Both plaintiffs seek damages, an accounting of profits, and to enjoin Revise and Puma, respectively, from any future use of their allegedly infringing designs. Litigation in both cases is ongoing.

    A similar trademark infringement case related to a line of fragrances may be drawing to a close. In November 2009, the US Polo Association, Inc. sought a declaratory judgment that using its double horsemen logo on a line of fragrances would not infringe Polo Ralph Lauren Corp.’s polo player trademark for fragrances, after-shave, and similar goods. Polo Ralph Lauren made counterclaims alleging trademark infringement and moved for a preliminary injunction. See United States Polo Association v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc., Docket No. 09-cv-9476 (SDNY Nov. 13, 2009). Please see below for images of the US Polo and Polo Ralph Lauren marks.

    U.S. Polo Association double
    horsemen logo
    Polo Ralph Lauren logo

    On September 17, 2010, US Polo and Polo Ralph Lauren reached an agreement relating to some of the issues in the case. US Polo has agreed to cease using the color blue as the principal color in its fragrance packaging, and has agreed to halt all fragrance sales pending the court’s ruling on Polo Ralph Lauren’s preliminary injunction motion.

    In these cases, Levi Strauss, SR Holdings, and Polo Ralph Lauren hold federal trademark registrations for their respective designs, i.e., the Pro-Keds Power Stripe, the Arcuate pocket stitching design, and the Polo Ralph Lauren logo. These federal registrations present solid evidence of the first element of trademark infringement claims – that the parties claiming infringement own valid, protectable trademarks. To win their cases, these parties must also prove likelihood of confusion. That is, Levi Strauss, SR Holdings, and Polo Ralph Lauren must show that consumers are likely to be confused as to who makes which jeans, sneakers, and fragrances, respectively.

    These cases illustrate the extent to which clothing and footwear companies will seek to protect their design trademarks from infringement. Apparel, footwear, and accessory manufacturers preparing products for the market should seek the advice of intellectual property counsel on how to protect their valuable intellectual property and how to avoid possible trademark infringement claims. To learn more about Arent Fox’s work in this area, please contact:

    Anthony V. Lupo
    lupo.anthony@arentfox.com
    202.857.6353

    Sarah Bruno
    bruno.sarah@arentfox.com
    202.775.5760

    Grace L. Applefeld
    applefeld.grace@arentfox.com
    202.857.6498

    Related People

    • Sarah L. Bruno
    • Anthony V. Lupo

    Related Practices

    Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
    Intellectual Property
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.