• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Consumers Take Privacy Concerns to the Courts

    December 30, 2010

    Apple and its application providers are beings sued for permitting iPhones and iPads to be tracked and user behavior to be transmitted to third parties without users’ knowledge. Currently, two class action lawsuits are pending against the companies in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The suits allege that each iPhone and iPad carries a Unique Device Identifier (UDID) that permits advertising companies to track not only the frequency with which the application is used, but also the user that is accessing the application. Moreover, the suits allege that some of the application providers sell user demographic information including age, gender, and political views to third-party advertising networks.

    These suits were filed based on current privacy laws, but stand for a consumer attempt to do what federal legislation has yet to accomplish. Consumers involved in the class actions are asking the federal court to put an end to the pervasive sharing of consumer information that takes place over the Internet via computers and mobile devices. Tracking methods include cookies, identifiers such as the UDID, and other tracking mechanisms. And, current privacy policies provide little notice to consumers of such tracking devices where they are usually very lengthy and seldom read.

    Currently, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has proposed a potential Do-Not-Track system, but the design and implementation procedure for such a system is still under debate. Likewise, the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA) is devising industry privacy guidelines that may aid with some of the consumer concerns mentioned in the suits. Until the FTC and MMA’s guidelines are produced, suits such as these may be consumers’ best defense to tracking. Industry leaders are, however, urged, to design company-specific privacy measures to avoid overly impinging on consumer privacy.

    Arent Fox is monitoring these cases and other privacy issues. Please contact Anthony V. Lupo, Sarah Bruno, or Eva Pulliam with questions.

    Anthony V. Lupo
    lupo.anthony@arentfox.com
    202.857.6353

    Sarah Bruno
    bruno.sarah@arentfox.com
    202.775.5760

    Eva Pulliam
    pulliam.eva@arentfox.com
    202.857.6323

    Related People

    • Sarah L. Bruno
    • Anthony V. Lupo
    • Eva J. Pulliam

    Related Practices

    Intellectual Property
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.