• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Defending Your Brand in the .xxx World

    March 16, 2012

    Since December 6, 2011, when .xxx domains became generally available for registration, brand owners and public figures have faced the reality that their trademarks and personal names may be registered by cybersquatters looking to make a quick buck, or by members of the adult entertainment industry who will use the name/mark with a pornographic website. While there are several new dispute resolution options available to such rights holders, including the Rapid Evaluation Service (RES) and the Charter Eligibility Dispute Resolution Policy (CEDRP), it is becoming clear that the traditional Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is still a viable option to recover domains under this new generic top level domain.

    To date, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has had ten .xxx domain name cases before it, and the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) has had seven. Of the seven cases before the National Arbitration Forum, two (heb.xxx and richardbranson.xxx) have resulted in the transfer of the domains, while one (foxstudios.xxx) was withdrawn. The remaining four cases are currently pending. Before WIPO, the statistics are similar; one case was terminated without transfer (valero.xxx), one domain was successfully transferred to the complainant (denizbank.xxx), and the remaining eight cases are still pending.

    While we are early in the enforcement process for .xxx domains, some patterns are becoming evident. In the case of heb.xxx, where the panel ordered the transfer of the domain to the trademark owner, the respondent failed to make active use of the domain name and was not a member of the adult entertainment industry. Similarly, in the case of richardbranson.xxx, the registrant had no plans to commercialize or make active use of the domain name and was not a member of the adult entertainment industry. These decisions indicate that brand owners and public figures will have an easier time winning cases where the registrants are not members of the adult entertainment industry and are not making active use of the domains. It is also clear from these decisions that UDRP panels can, and will, consider both RES and CEDRP provisions when deciding a UDRP case, including the rule that a .xxx registrant must be a member of the adult entertainment industry (or a pre-existing rights holder). What remains to be seen, however, is how UDRP cases will be decided when the registrant is a member of the adult entertainment industry and is making active use of the website in connection with adult content.

    Given the expense and uncertainty of recovering a domain registered by a cybersquatter or a member of the adult entertainment industry, brand owners should strongly consider applying for .xxx domain names incorporating their trademarks, company names, popular product/service names, and the like, through domain name registrars. For assistance with this process or with enforcement options once a third party registers your name or brand in a .xxx domain, please contact the attorneys listed at right.

    Related People

    • Anthony V. Lupo
    • Amy E. Salomon

    Related Practices

    Intellectual Property

    Related Industries

    Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.