• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Fan Sues NHL Team for Exceeding Consent Under the TCPA

    August 9, 2012

    In a recent case in California, plaintiff Fred Weiss filed a class action lawsuit alleging that the Pittsburgh Penguins violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and breached the terms of service for their text message notification program. The TCPA generally provides a cause of action where a marketer sends unsolicited calls to a mobile phone. The term “calls” includes text messages. The terms for the Penguins Mobile Media Club indicated that fans who signed up for the messaging program would receive a “maximum of 3 messages a week.” However, Weiss alleges that he received messages in excess of that limit.

    Specifically, after signing up for the program, Weiss alleges that he received more than three messages per week—at times receiving four or five messages in a single week. Instead of unsubscribing from the text message program, Weiss filed suit arguing that the additional messages were sent without consent and therefore violated the TCPA prohibition on unsolicited text messages and breached the Pittsburgh Penguins’ contract with him. In his complaint, Weiss argues that the team “intentionally and systematically transmitted text messages to individual consumers in excess of that weekly limit” and that such actions caused him harm in the form of “aggravation that necessarily accompanies the invasion of privacy caused by unsolicited text message calls.” Weiss is seeking an injunction, statutory damages, and attorneys’ fees.

    Although the Mobile Marketing Association recommends that marketers notify consumers of the estimated frequency with which they will receive messages, this case provides a warning that inserting restrictive limits or terms such as “up to” or “maximum” may result in liability where a program exceeds the limit. In such situations, marketers may consider indicating slightly more messages than will actually be sent to provide flexibility or avoiding overly restrictive terms such as those indicated above. And, in any case, marketers should not exceed the consent provided by consumers.

    Arent Fox continues to monitor issues related to the TCPA and marketing. Please contact Anthony V. Lupo, Sarah L. Bruno, Matthew R. Mills, or Eva J. Pulliam with questions.

    Related People

    • Sarah L. Bruno
    • Anthony V. Lupo
    • Matthew R. Mills
    • Eva J. Pulliam

    Related Practices

    Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.