• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    FCC Bans Exclusive Cable Agreements with Real Estate Owners

    November 2, 2007

    On October 31, 2007, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted a Report and Order (Order) banning the use of exclusivity clauses for the provision of video services to multiple dwelling units or other real estate developments. Specifically, the Order:

    1. Prohibits exclusive access agreements between franchised cable operators (such as Comcast, Time Warner, etc.) and multiple dwelling unit owners (such as apartment complex owners).

    2. Once the Order is effective (which will be 30 days after it is published in the Federal Register), existing contracts between franchised cable operators and multiple dwelling unit owners that have exclusive access provisions may remain in effect, but the exclusive access provision in such contracts will be unenforceable.

    The FCC will soon decide the following:

    1.Whether to extend its prohibition to exclusive access agreements between multiple dwelling unit owners and video services providers other than franchised cable operators (such as DIRECTV, Dish Network and private operators). Currently, the ban is only for agreements with cable franchise operators (and video dialtone operators, of which there are very few).

    2. Whether to prohibit "exclusive marketing arrangements" between multiple dwelling unit owners and franchised cable operators and other video service providers.

    3. Whether to prohibit 'bulk billing arrangements" between multiple dwelling unit owners and franchised cable operators and other video service providers.

    4. Whether to adopt a similar prohibition on agreements concerning telecommunications services, such as local and long distance services.

    While the Order bans certain exclusive agreements as discussed above, it does not authorize a video service provider to access a property to provide video services over the objections of the multiple dwelling unit owner (although some state laws do permit such a taking of property).

    For more information, please contact

    Alan Fishel
    fishel.alan@arentfox.com
    202.857.6450

    Jeffrey Rummel
    rummelj@arentfox.com
    202.715.8479

    Related People

    • Alan G. Fishel
    • Jeffrey E. Rummel

    Related Practices

    Communications, Technology & Mobile
    Real Estate
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.