• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    FCC Places GroupMe Petition Out for Public Comment

    July 26, 2012

    On July 25, 2012, the Federal Communications Commission finally placed a March 2012 Petition addressing certain SMS issues from GroupMe, Inc. out for public comment. GroupMe has asked the FCC to clarify issues related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which would have a wide-ranging impact on the industry however they are decided.

    GroupMe asks for two clarifications. First, GroupMe asks the FCC to clarify the scope of the term “capacity” in the definition of “automatic telephone dialing system” (ATDS) as used in the TCPA. Under the TCPA, use of an ATDS is generally prohibited, and ATDS is defined as any equipment which has the “capacity” to autodial random or sequential numbers. Some courts and many plaintiffs’ lawyers have taken a broad view of “capacity,” meaning even if equipment cannot presently autodial random or sequential numbers, even the potential ability to do so creates exposure to TCPA claims. GroupMe points out in its Petition that any modern piece of telecommunications equipment, even an iPhone, has the potential ability to autodial random or sequential numbers, but that cannot be the intent of the TCPA. GroupMe asks the FCC to clarify that “capacity” means equipment that could have in fact, at the time of use, autodialed random or sequential numbers without human intervention and without being technologically altered.

    Second, GroupMe asks the FCC to clarify that “for non-telemarketing, informational calls or text messages to wireless numbers, which can permissibly be made using an ATDS under the TCPA with the called party's oral prior express consent, the caller can rely on a representation from an intermediary that they have obtained the requisite consent from the called party.” In other words, GroupMe is asking the FCC to clarify that a person can tell an SMS sender that their friend has given the person permission to receive texts from the SMS sender and the SMS sender does not need to obtain direct consent from the friend.

    If either or both issues are clarified in the manner requested by GroupMe, companies that use SMS could potentially face fewer TCPA lawsuits because the ability to prove a violation on these issues would likely be foreclosed in civil cases seeking to challenge such practices. Any company that uses SMS should consider submitting comments on these issues.

    GroupMe’s Petition is available here. The Public Notice asking for comment is available here.

    Comments are due August 30, 2012, and replies are due September 10, 2012.

    More information can be found by contacting Ross A. Buntrock, Michael B. Hazzard, Jason A. Koslofsky or any of our attorneys in the Telecommunications practice.

    Related People

    • Ross A. Buntrock
    • Michael B. Hazzard

    Related Practices

    Communications, Technology & Mobile
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.