• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    FTC Finalizes Endorsement and Testimonial Guidelines for Advertisers

    October 12, 2009

    The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently completed its revisions of its Guides Concerning the Use of Testimonials and Endorsements in Advertising (the Guides).  The Guides are the FTC’s interpretation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and are intended to serve as guidance for advertisers.

    The most notable revisions involve the elimination of the “results not typical” safe harbor, new  disclosure requirements for bloggers and celebrities, and an explicit statement that endorsers can be held liable for statements that are made in an endorsement.

    Elimination of the “Results Not Typical” Safe Harbor for Consumer Testimonials

    The FTC has eliminated the “safe harbor” provision that allowed advertisers to use consumer testimonials describing unusual or extreme results as long as they included a “results not typical” disclaimer.  The FTC is now taking the position that testimonials describing consumer experiences with a product will be interpreted as representing the results consumers will typically achieve under actual conditions of use. 

    If advertisers lack adequate substantiation for claims made in testimonials, then they will be required to disclose affirmatively the results consumers can generally expect to achieve from the product being promoted.  For instance, if an advertisement states that three homeowners have saved $100, $125, and $130 because they have used a particular heat pump, then the advertiser must include a disclaimer such as “the average homeowner saves $35” to indicate what the expected monthly savings is likely to be if the advertiser does not have substantiation that these individuals’ monthly savings are representative.  The FTC does acknowledge that a strongly worded disclaimer that the endorser’s results are atypical may be acceptable in some situations provided that the advertiser has empirical evidence that consumers are not misled when the disclaimer is included.

    Disclosure of “Material Connections” by Bloggers

    The FTC’s revisions will regulate both (i) bloggers who are paid compensation or given other incentives such as complimentary products in exchange for posting a review or comments about a product, and (ii) bloggers who have other material connections with the manufacturer of a product.

    Bloggers must now disclose that they received payment or other compensation in exchange for the review or that they received the product free of charge.  For example, a college student who earned a reputation as an “expert” based on his online reviews of game hardware and software must disclose the retail price of the item and that it was provided at no cost in his review.  Additionally, the FTC advises that an individual who writes and posts favorable reviews of her employer’s MP3 players on online message boards must also disclose her relationship with the product’s manufacturer because her employment affects her credibility.

    More Rigorous Standards for Celebrity Endorsements

    The FTC revisions also strengthen the disclosure requirements for celebrity endorsements.  If a celebrity appears in a television or print advertisement promoting a product, no disclosure that the celebrity was paid is necessary because consumers expect that a celebrity would be compensated for such an appearance.  However, the revisions clarify that there are some situations in which consumers would not have this expectation but where a celebrity’s financial interest would be relevant.  For example, the FTC now would require a celebrity appearing on a talk show to disclose that she is a paid spokesperson for a product, even though she does not appear in commercials for the product if the celebrity substantively discusses the product during the interview.  In contrast, if the celebrity simply appeared on the show wearing clothes bearing a company’s logo without discussing them, then no disclosure would be necessary.

    Liability for Endorsers

    The revisions to the Guides also emphasize that endorsers, as well as advertisers, can be subject to liability if the FTC finds an advertisement false or misleading.  For example, if a celebrity makes a statement while pitching a product in an advertisement she knows misrepresents the product’s effectiveness, she could be liable in an FTC enforcement action. 

    Today’s evolving regulatory policies make it prudent to seek legal counsel before engaging in marketing that involves the use of testimonials or endorsements.

    For further information, please contact:

    Anthony V. Lupo
    lupo.anthony@arentfox.com
    202.857.6353

    Matthew R. Mills
    mills.matthew@arentfox.com
    202.715.8582

    Related People

    • Anthony V. Lupo
    • Matthew R. Mills

    Related Practices

    Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
    Intellectual Property
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.