• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Industry Groups Develop Guidance for FTC Testimonial and Endorsement Guidelines Compliance

    January 6, 2010

    Industry groups are currently working to develop best practices guidelines to assist corporations in complying with the Federal Trade Commission’s revised Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.  These revisions regulate both (i) bloggers who are paid compensation or given other incentives such as complimentary products in exchange for posting a review or comments about a product, and (ii) bloggers who have other material connections with the manufacturer of a product.  Arent Fox has previously reported on the revised FTC endorsement and testimonial guides.  See the previous coverage here.

    The Word of Mouth Marketing Association (WOMMA), a leading organization of marketing professionals, is currently finalizing its guidelines on best practices for marketers and bloggers.  WOMMA is seen by many as a bellwether in the field.  The organization’s Ethics Code and its comments were well-received by the Federal Trade Commission when the agency recently revised its Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising. 

    A draft copy of WOMMA’s best practices guidelines includes practical advice on how those who use social media should disclose their marketing ties.  The guidelines suggest that bloggers state that “I received ______ from (company X) as a sample/to review” in editorials and reviews for which they have given sample products.  For disclosures on social networks, the guidelines suggest including a similar notice either as part of a status update or as a photo or video description.  WOMMA suggests that both users’ blogs and social media profiles include a “Disclosure and Relationships” section disclosing material connections.  For Twitter, best practices also include creating a “Disclosures and Relationships” section on one’s Twitter profile, as well as clearly noting “#spon” or “#paid” within a tweet that has been sponsored or paid for by a company.

    WOMMA’s comment period for its best practices guidelines closed on January 5, 2010.  The final draft should be released shortly thereafter.     

    For more information on how marketers and bloggers can best comply with new government disclosure regulations, please contact:

    Anthony V. Lupo
    lupo.anthony@arentfox.com
    202.857.6353

    Matthew R. Mills
    mills.matthew@arentfox.com
    202.715.8582

    Grace L. Applefeld
    applefeld.grace@arentfox.com
    202.857.6498 

    Related People

    • Anthony V. Lupo
    • Matthew R. Mills

    Related Practices

    Advertising, Promotions & Data Security

    Related Industries

    Media & Entertainment
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.