• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Iowa Utilities Board Denies Reconsideration of 2009 Access Charge Decision

    February 7, 2011

    On February 4, 2011, the Iowa Utilities Board (Board) released its Order Denying Requests for Reconsideration, approximately eighteen months after several local exchange carriers (LECs) challenged the Final Order issued in Qwest Communications Corp. v. Superior Telephone Cooperative, et al., Docket No. FCU-07-2. The Board reaffirmed the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Final Order in all material respects. To view a copy of the Order on Reconsideration, click here.

    This complaint case arose in February 2007 when Qwest, later joined by Sprint and AT&T, challenged the LECs’ practice of billing terminating switched access charges to interexchange carriers (IXCs) for completing calls to the conference calling companies that the LECs serve. In September 2009, the Board released its Final Order in the case, holding that the conference calling companies are not “end users” under the LECs’ intrastate switched access tariffs, and therefore the IXCs are not required to pay terminating access charges for calls to those companies.

    The Order on Reconsideration reiterates the Board’s finding that the conference calling companies did not “subscribe” to local exchange service, and therefore were not “end users” under the LECs’ local tariffs. The Board further held that although the LECs may have attempted to create Individual Case Basis (ICB) arrangements via separate contracts with the conference calling companies, those services do not constitute local exchange service. On this point, the Board stated that ICB contracts may not be used to create “wholesale exceptions for favored customers.”

    The Board also reiterated its finding that the LECs and conference calling companies are “business partners” under Iowa law. As such, the Board held, the conference calling companies cannot be deemed “end users” of the LECs’ service. The Board further found that the term “end user’s premises” in the LECs’ access tariffs require that calls terminate to “a building or buildings that is owned, leased, or otherwise controlled by the end user,” and thus calls terminated to the conference calling companies collocated within LEC buildings are not compensable under the LECs’ access tariffs.

    The Board now intends to examine the IXCs’ calculations of the access charges they were billed, and will order the LECs to refund some amount of those charges.

    For further information about the Board’s decision or other access-related cases, please contact any of our attorneys listed below.

    Ross A. Buntrock
    buntrock.ross@arentfox.com
    202.775.5734

    Stephanie A. Joyce
    joyce.stephanie@arentfox.com
    202.857.6081

    Jonathan E. Canis
    canis.jonathan@arentfox.com
    202.775.5738

    Jeffrey E. Rummel
    rummel.jeffrey@arentfox.com
    202.715.8479

    Alan G. Fishel
    fishel.alan@arentfox.com
    202.857.6450

    Adam Bowser
    bowser.adam@arentfox.com
    202.857.6126

    Michael B. Hazzard
    hazzard.michael@arentfox.com
    202.857.6029

    Related People

    • Adam D. Bowser
    • Ross A. Buntrock
    • Jonathan E. Canis
    • Alan G. Fishel
    • Michael B. Hazzard
    • Stephanie A. Joyce
    • Jeffrey E. Rummel

    Related Practices

    Communications, Technology & Mobile
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.