• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Massachusetts Considers Taking the “Negative” Out of Negative Options

    November 18, 2011

    The Massachusetts state legislature is currently considering a bill to severely limit sellers’ ability to enroll consumers through negative option sales. This bill, like the federal Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act signed into law by President Obama in 2010, places restrictions on entities that use negative option sales.

    Negative option plans, as defined by the Federal Trade Commission, are commercial transactions in which sellers interpret a customer’s failure to take an affirmative action, either to reject an offer or cancel an ongoing subscription, as an agreement to be charged for goods or services. The most common example of a negative option is the conversion of a limited-time “free trial” into a program where fees are charged to consumers on a reoccurring basis if they do not cancel prior to the expiration of the free trial.

    Under the proposed bill, sellers and any other entity that promotes the exchange of goods or services for money must provide notice to consumers that they will incur charges following a free trial period. Prior to any charges, the consumers must provide the seller with their express consent to be charged. The seller must also provide advance notice of any charges by at least 10 days if the goods and or services have already been delivered to the consumer or 15 days for all other transactions. The bill also specifies that the notice must be “clearly written” and include the following items: (1) a description of the underlying agreement governing the transaction; (2) a description of the purchased goods and/or services; (3) the amount that the customer will be billed; (4) the date the customer will be billed if the agreement is not cancelled; and (5) the steps the customer must take to cancel the agreement. Should a dispute arise, the seller bears the burden of proving the customer’s express consent to be charged

    If Massachusetts House Bill No. 1014 becomes law, Massachusetts will have added itself to the list of other states, such as California, Connecticut, New York, Florida, Illinois, New Mexico, Louisiana, and North Carolina, that have already enacted legislation that affects how negative option offers are marketed. Arent Fox will continue to monitor this bill, as well as other laws and regulations covering negative options and e-commerce.

    Related People

    • Sarah L. Bruno
    • Matthew R. Mills
    • Eva J. Pulliam

    Related Practices

    Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.