• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    The Online TV Streaming Debate Continues: Networks Sue BarryDriller.com

    August 27, 2012

    The debate over whether the streaming of broadcast television is legal has found its way to court again. On August 7, 2012, BarryDriller Content Systems Plc. (“BDCS”) launched its streaming service on the website www.barrydriller.com. Three days later, on August 10, 2012, NBCUniversal LLC, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., CBS Broadcasting Inc., and Fox Broadcasting Inc., sued BDCS for copyright infringement. Fox Broadcasting Inc. also brought a claim for trademark infringement.

    Founded by Alki David, the CEO of FilmOn PLC, an online streaming website that recently reached a settlement agreement with the networks, BDCS provides subscribers in Los Angeles and several other major cities access to broadcast television on their computers and mobile devices for a monthly fee. BDCS provides its users with small antennas that capture live television signals, allowing users to watch live television over the Internet without any additional devices. BDCS’s services do not include DVR capability.

    In the wake of the recent decision denying an injunction against Aereo, Inc., as previously discussed by Arent Fox, the networks argue that “no amount of technological gimmickry by [BDCS] changes the fundamental principle of copyright law that those who wish to retransmit…broadcasts may only do so with Plaintiff’s authority.” Accordingly, the networks assert that by retransmitting copyrighted content without a license, BDCS violates the rights granted under the Copyright Act. The networks believe that BDCS’s services will harm their agreements with affiliates and online services like iTunes and Hulu, and could have an effect on advertising revenue since the networks will not be able to determine BDCS’s viewership and the popularity of content.

    As Internet-based television grows in popularity, networks will likely face continued efforts to retransmit and repackage programming by third parties. Whether this retransmission is legal under the Copyright Act could have a significant effect on the industry. As new methods of recording and broadcasting content develop, networks have adjusted their business models to license content differently, and will have to continue to do so. Arent Fox is monitoring this case. For more information on this case or any other cases involving copyright infringement, please contact Anthony V. Lupo, Sarah Bruno, or Luna M. Samman.

    Related People

    • Sarah L. Bruno
    • Anthony V. Lupo
    • Luna M. Samman

    Related Practices

    Intellectual Property
    Copyright

    Related Industries

    Media & Entertainment
    Internet & Digital Media
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.