• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Sketchers Goes Toe-to-Toe against The Children’s Place in Law Suit over Sneakers

    February 15, 2012

    The US District Court for the Central District of California is currently hearing a patent infringement, trade dress infringement, and unfair competition case over the sale and distribution of competing lines of rhinestone-covered children’s sneakers. The popular fashion company Sketchers USA, Inc. distributes a line of canvas sneakers with toe caps covered in rhinestones and other shiny objects, and canvass uppers covered in colorful art designs or patterns. To protect its toe-cap ornamentation, Sketchers acquired a patent from the US Patent and Trademark Office. In its lawsuit, Sketchers also claims federal trade dress protection in the combination of the vulcanized canvass sneaker, the rhinestone-covered top cap, and the canvass upper covered in colorful art designs or patterns (“the Twinkle Toes® Trade Dress”). According to the lawsuit, well after Sketchers began selling the Twinkle Toes line of shoes, its competitor, the Children’s Place Retail Stores, Inc. (Children’s Place), started selling a similar line of shoes:

    Image of Sketcher's Twinkle Toe sneaker and Children's Place sneaker for comparison

    In the lawsuit, Sketchers claims that as a result of its extensive advertising, marketing, sales, and distribution, its Twinkle Toes line of shoes has acquired secondary meaning, and the combination of elements that compose the Twinkle Toes Trade Dress have become uniquely associated with Sketchers in the minds of consumers. Therefore, Sketchers alleges that the Children’s Place’s making, selling, and importation of a similar line of sneakers with rhinestone-covered toe caps and canvass uppers covered in colorful artistic designs constitutes trade dress infringement, patent infringement, and unfair competition. Sketchers alleges that consumers are likely to be confused as to the association between Sketchers and the Children’s Place, and as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of the Children’s Place’s similar shoe line.

    The suit demonstrates the different legal claims that fashion companies must cobble together to protect their fashion designs, as the law currently does not recognize copyright protection for fashion designs. Instead, companies such as Sketchers must turn to patent, trade dress, and unfair competition laws to fight the allegedly “willful” infringement of their ornamental fashion designs.

    For more information on Sketchers USA, Inc. v. The Children’s Place Retail Stores, Inc., and legal protections for fashion designs, please contact the attorneys listed above.

    Related People

    • Sarah L. Bruno
    • Anthony V. Lupo
    • Amy E. Salomon

    Related Practices

    Intellectual Property

    Related Industries

    Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.