• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 22 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    US Department of Labor Rules that Employer May Require Exempt Employees to Use Accrued Vacation Time During Shutdown for Less than a Full Workweek

    March 12, 2009

    During this economic downturn, an increasing number of employers are turning to furloughs and/or complete shutdowns as a means of saving labor costs.  These types of actions can be tricky when they affect exempt employees who are paid on a salary basis.

    The US Department of Labor (DOL) defines “salary basis” in pertinent part as follows:

    An employee will be considered to be paid on a “salary basis” within the meaning of these regulations if the employee regularly receives each pay period on a weekly, or less frequent basis, a predetermined amount constituting all or part of the employee's compensation, which amount is not subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of the work performed. Subject to the exceptions provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an exempt employee must receive the full salary for any week in which the employee performs any work without regard to the number of days or hours worked. Exempt employees need not be paid for any workweek in which they perform no work. An employee is not paid on a salary basis if deductions from the employee's predetermined compensation are made for absences occasioned by the employer or by the operating requirements of the business. If the employee is ready, willing and able to work, deductions may not be made for time when work is not available.

    29 C.F.R. § 541.602(a).

    One of the implications of the foregoing regulation is that if an employer shuts down a facility entirely or furloughs some employees, in each case for less than a workweek, but does not pay exempt employees their regular salary for that workweek, it could unwittingly convert them to non-exempt employees, in which case it may be liable for overtime compensation for such employees going back two or three years.

    In a recent Opinion Letter, however, the DOL confirmed that if an employer shuts down a facility or furloughs employees for less than a workweek, but forces exempt employees to use accrued vacation time during the time off that week, it does not violate the salary basis regulation.  Wage-Hour Opinion Letter No. 2009-2 (January 14, 2009, released March 6, 2009).

    According to the Opinion Letter, it is the Wage and Hour Division’s position that:

    [s]ince employers are not required under the [Fair Labor Standards Act] to provide any vacation time to employees, there is no prohibition on an employer giving vacation time and later requiring that such vacation time be taken on a specific day(s).  Therefore, a private employer may direct exempt staff to take vacation or debit their leave bank account ... , whether for a full or partial day’s absence, provided the employees receive in payment an amount equal to their guaranteed salary.   

    (Citations omitted).

    Thus, the DOL concluded that “the employer may require exempt employees to use accrued vacation time for any absence, including one resulting from a plant shutdown, without affecting their exempt status, provided that employees receive a payment in an amount equal to their guaranteed salary.”  However, the DOL made it clear that “an exempt employee who has no accrued [vacation] benefits ... or has a negative balance ... still must receive the employee’s guaranteed salary for any absence(s) occasioned by the employer or the operating requirements of the business.”   

    Although this Opinion Letter offers some flexibility to employers who wish to furlough exempt employees for less than a full workweek, the fact that employers still have to pay employees their accrued vacation for the partial time off that workweek means that the employer will not realize as much or any immediate cost savings as a result of the furlough.  Of course, employers generally may always furlough non-exempt employees for less than a full workweek without having to pay them accrued vacation time.

    The Arent Fox Employment Law Group regularly advises employers on layoff, furlough and wage and hour issues.  If you have any questions about any of these issues, please feel free to contact us.

    Michael L. Stevens
    stevens.michael@arentfox.com
    202.857.6382

    Related People

    • Michael L. Stevens

    Related Practices

    Labor & Employment
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.