• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Vermont Attorney General Pursuing Crammers

    June 29, 2012

    While the federal government and numerous states all work to issue and enforce legislation related to cramming, Vermont is stepping out ahead of the crowd.

    “Cramming” is generally understood to mean the placing of unauthorized charges on unrelated third-party bills. Most often, the laws regulating cramming pertain to telecommunications bills. In the interest of consumer protection, federal and state authorities are working to prohibit cramming, requiring express authorization prior to the placing of third-party charges on consumer’s service provider bills. While the Federal Communications Commission, state public utility commissions and attorneys general work to regulate crammers, Vermont has been even more aggressive on this front.

    As recently as May 2012, the Vermont Attorney General filed suit against 13 companies and 13 individuals that were allegedly involved in charging more than 8,000 Vermont residents and businesses over $625,000 on their phone bill for unauthorized services. The defendants are marketers of voicemail, email, and similar services. According to the state, the unauthorized charges violated the Vermont Consumer Fraud Act, which requires specific notice for any charges for non-telephone services on a telephone bill. The complaint asks the court to prohibit future violations of the law and award $10,000 in civil penalties for each past violation in addition to full refunds. Since that time, Vermont has passed a new law that creates a virtual ban on all third-party charges with limited exceptions.

    All companies that partner with third parties to bill consumers and that are interested in placing their charges on third-party bills should be aware of Vermont’s recent activity in this area and of other federal and state laws governing cramming. Unlike many states that simply require specific authorization procedures prior to billing, Vermont virtually prohibits third party charges on telecommunications bills. Therefore, third parties may be required to issue separate bills to cover their services — even low-cost monthly services.

    Arent Fox is continuing to monitor issues related to e-commerce and billing. Please contact Anthony V. Lupo, Sarah L. Bruno, Matthew R. Mills, or Eva J. Pulliam with questions.

    Related People

    • Sarah L. Bruno
    • Anthony V. Lupo
    • Matthew R. Mills
    • Eva J. Pulliam

    Related Practices

    Advertising, Promotions & Data Security

    Related Industries

    Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.