• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Warning Letter to Lancôme Signals Stepped-Up Enforcement of Cosmetics/Cosmeceuticals

    September 11, 2012

    On September 7, 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Warning Letter to high-end cosmetics maker, Lancôme USA, due to product claims on the company’s website.  The FDA has taken the position that these claims demonstrate the products are “intended to affect the structure and function of the body” rendering them drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.  The products cited by the FDA include those in the Génifique, Absolue, and Rénergie lines of products.  The specific claims made for these products to which the FDA objects include:

    • “boosts the activity of genes and stimulates the production of youth proteins.” 
    • “boosts the activity of genes.” 
    • “…has been shown to improve the condition around the stem cells and stimulate cell regeneration to reconstruct skin to a denser quality.”
    • “see significant deep wrinkle reduction in UV damaged skin, clinically proven.” 
    • “immediate lifting, lasting repositioning. Inspired by eye-lifting surgical techniques... helps recreate a younger, lifted look in the delicate eye area.”
    • “unique R.A.R.E. oligopeptide helps to re-bundle collagen.”

    While the allegedly violative products do not explicitly claim to treat diseases or health conditions, it appears that their references to biological activity involving “genes,” “proteins,” “stem cells,” “peptides,” and “collagen” are viewed by the FDA as being outside the realm of what the Agency considers to be acceptable cosmetic claims.  This is significant because nearly identical claims for cosmetics and cosmeceuticals have become commonplace in today’s “new age” cosmetics market.

    In the last decade, the FDA has issued few Warning Letters for cosmetics and generally has only done so when product claims include direct references to diseases and health conditions like acne, eczema, diabetes, or cancer.  However, the FDA’s Warning Letter to Lancôme signals a potentially significant new enforcement position that the Agency may be taking towards cosmetics, and, more specifically, towards cosmeceuticals that include scientific language to describe their biologically-enhanced benefits.  Lancôme has 15 days to respond to the FDA’s Warning Letter.  We will continue to follow this and other FDA enforcement actions related to cosmetics.  For additional information on this issue, please contact Georgia C. Ravitz or Jim Hartten at Arent Fox LLP. Click here to view the FDA’s Warning Letter: http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2012/ucm318809.htm

    Related People

    • James H. Hartten*
    • Georgia Ravitz

    Related Practices

    FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.