• Connect
  • Bookmark Us
  • AF Twitter
  • AF YouTube
  • AF LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Link
Arent Fox
  • Firm

    • History

    • Awards & Recognitions

    • Diversity

      • Overview
      • Diversity Scholarship
      • Employees on Diversity
      • LGBT Initiative
      • Women’s Leadership Development Initiative
    • Alumni

    • Pro Bono

      • Overview
      • Current Pro Bono Work
      • Community Involvement
      • Pro Bono Newsletter
      • Pro Bono Awards & Honors
      • FAQ: Pro Bono & Working at Arent Fox
    • Leadership

      • Firm Management
      • Administrative Leadership
  • Deals & Cases

  • People

  • Practices & Industries

    • Practices

      • Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
      • Government Relations
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Health Care
      • Appellate
      • Insurance & Reinsurance
      • Bankruptcy & Financial Restructuring
      • Intellectual Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • International Trade
      • Communications, Technology & Mobile
      • Labor & Employment
      • Construction
      • Municipal & Project Finance
      • Consumer Product Safety
      • OSHA
      • Corporate & Securities
      • Political Law
      • ERISA
      • Real Estate
      • Environmental
      • Tax
      • FDA Practice (Food & Drug)
      • Wealth Planning & Management
      • Finance
      • White Collar & Investigations
      • Government Contractor Services
    • Industries

      • Automotive
      • Energy Law & Policy
      • Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
      • Government Real Estate & Public Buildings
      • Hospitality
      • Life Sciences
      • Long Term Care & Senior Living
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Medical Devices
      • Nonprofit
      • Sports
  • Newsroom

    • Alerts

    • Events

    • Media Mentions

    • Press Releases

    • Social Media

    • Subscribe

  • Careers

    • Lawyers

    • Law Students

    • Professional Staff

  • Contact

    • Washington, DC

    • New York, NY

    • Los Angeles, CA

    Alerts

    • Newsroom Overview
      • Alerts

        Alerts by Criteria

        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
        E.g., 1 / 21 / 2013
      • Events
      • Media Mentions
      • Press Releases
      • Social Media
      • Subscribe

    You are here

    Home » Newsroom » Alerts

    Share

    • Printer-friendly version
    • Send by email
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A Title
    • A
    • A
    • A

    Woody Allen Sues American Apparel, Inc. Over Billboard Advertisements

    April 7, 2008

    On March 31, 2008, renowned actor/director Woody Allen filed a lawsuit against American Apparel Inc. (AAI), alleging the clothing manufacturer used his image and likeness on their billboards without his consent. Allen, who filed the suit in US District Court in Manhattan, seeks exemplary, punitive, and compensatory damages in the amount of at least $10 million, for right of privacy violations under state law and false advertisement violations under the Lanham Act.

    AAI is one of the largest clothing manufacturers in the United States and is responsible for creating its own marketing and advertising initiatives. While the company’s founder and CEO has been subject to scrutiny over the brand’s racy advertisements, this is the first time the company has allegedly misappropriated a celebrity’s image. The billboard advertisements at issue feature an image of Allen from one of his films, Annie Hall, surrounded by text in Yiddish, which translates to mean “the Holy Rebbe.” The billboard was publicly displayed in New York City and Hollywood, both cities in which Allen asserts he is especially recognizable because of his reputation in the entertainment industry. The advertisement was also shown on the Internet.

    Allen alleges that the use of his image and likeness on AAI billboards without his consent falsely implies that Allen endorsed the brand, which is known for its use of provocative images in advertising. This alleged conduct potentially violates the right of privacy provisions of New York’s Civil Rights Laws. Furthermore, a jury could find that AAI’s conduct is deceiving and confusing because it falsely represents to the public that Allen sponsors, endorses, or is associated with the brand, in violation of Section 43a of the Lanham Act. Section 43a prohibits false or misleading representations in commercial advertising that “[misrepresent] the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of . . . goods, services or commercial activities.” Allen requests a jury trial in the case, in addition to damages and attorneys’ fees.

    If you have questions, please contact Anthony Lupo or Sarah Bruno.

    Anthony V. Lupo
    lupo.anthony@arentfox.com
    202.857.6353

    Sarah L. Bruno
    bruno.sarah@arentfox.com
    202.775.5760

    Related People

    • Sarah L. Bruno
    • Anthony V. Lupo

    Related Practices

    Advertising, Promotions & Data Security
    Intellectual Property

    Related Industries

    Fashion, Luxury Goods & Retail
    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact

    Footer Main

    • Firm
    • Deals & Cases
    • People
    • Practices & Industries
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Subscribe
    • Alumni
    • Diversity
    • Legal Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • Nondiscrimination
    • Site Map
    • Client/Staff Login

    Offices

    • Washington, DC
      1717 K Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20036
      Tel: 202.857.6000
    • New York, NY
      1675 Broadway
      New York, New York 10019
      Tel: 212.484.3900
    • Los Angeles, CA
      555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
      Los Angeles, California 90013
      Tel: 213.629.7400
    • © Copyright 2013 Arent Fox LLP. All Rights Reserved.

      Legal Disclaimer
      Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.