Represented creator and manufacturer of changing portraits for the haunt industry in defense of copyright infringement action; following a five-day federal court trial, judgment was entered against the plaintiff on the copyright claim, and the court awarded attorneys' fees to the Firm's client
In Cabot Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. (D. Indiana), Arent Fox represented the defendant in district court, and before the Federal Circuit, in a case involving alleged infringement of utility and design patents by hearing protection devices.
In Grupo Andrea S.A. v. Privacy Protection Service (C.D. Cal. 2010), Arent Fox obtained a monetary judgment against a notorious cybersquatter that had used the client’s mark in a domain name linked to a monetized website that diverted prospective customers to client competitors.
Arent Fox takes over the defense in General Mills v. Soyyigit: Civil Action No. (D. Minn. 2011) involving trademark infringement when a preliminary injunction had been entered. A favorable settlement was achieved.
Arent Fox defended a trade secret and corporate raiding claim in a jury trial in federal court. Galaxy Computer Services, Inc. v. Baker, 325 B.R. 544 (E.D. Va. 2005); 2005 WL 2171454 (E.D. Va. Sept. 02, 2005).
Daesang Corporation v. Rhee Bros. Inc., (D. Md. 2005): At a trial in the federal court in Baltimore, Arent Fox defended a major Korean food company against infringement claims. The firm also proved that the plaintiff had obtained its trademark registration fraudulently.
BASF Corp. v. Eastman Chemical Co. (D. Delaware); represented defendant accused of infringing patent on a method of performing a catalyzed chemical reaction.
